![]() Then I noticed opacity was at 50% for the gradient tool. Then had to click on one of the points and THEN hit ENTER to apply it (I'm def blaming the devs on unusability here) I put in my exact r,g,b,a values into both the from and the to point and picked linear gradient. Thanks for any help you can throw my way.ĮDIT - given that the gradient tool DOES have alpha values you can pick in the from and to point, I figured it should work. Is gimp just this hard to use (so many settings with bad defaults) or am i dumb (a veryyyy real possibility) It looks ok, but when I apply the layer, or look at the tool result with the color picker tool, the alpha is not what I tried to get. Sometimes too low, sometimes too high, or 0 or 255 but can't get 128 to save my life. I just can NOT get a pixel with alpha of 128.Įverything I try gives me a weird alpha value. I know about edit layer mask / show layer mask / apply layer mask I have played with "add layer mask", setting opacity on various tools, tried the range tool and other tools with add layer mask. I want a one pixel png image with r=102 g=127 b=128 a=128 depending (maybe?) on opacity of gradient tool? or current alpha value? Additional information the only color picker that can directly set alpha is gradient tool (as far as i can tell) so set from pixel to r,g,b,a of 100,100,100,128 and set to pixel exactly the same and apply.Įxpected result: alpha of 128 for the pixelĪctual result: 128.Operating System: Kubuntu 21.04 (and patches up thru today 8/18/21)Īlpha of a pixel isn't being set correctly.Package: Discoverer on Kubuntu installed it (seems properly).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |